Abstract:
The brakes of a two-axle vehicle (3) are tested by weighing the vehicle and measuring the braking forces for both axles to determine the actual ratio of front axle braking force to total braking force. The deceleration (63) applied to the vehicle is determined from the weight of the vehicle and the applied braking forces. A nominal preferred value (67) of the ratio of front axle braking force to total braking force is calculated from the determined deceleration and the measured weight of the vehicle (60). For each test, upper (69) and lower limits (65) for the acceptability of the actual ratio of front axle braking force to total braking force are set based upon the computed nominal preferred value. The nominal preferred value, the movable limits, and the actual ratio are displayed to the user on a CRT screen (21). The actual ratio is displayed in the form of a bar on the screen, with the limits and nominal preferred value displayed as non-numeric indicia along the longitudinal axis of the bar.
Abstract:
Apparatus and method for determining the alignment positions and orientations of vehicle wheels (55-58) includes optical targets (63-66) mounted on the wheels and optical targets (67-70) mounted in a fixed relationship with respect to the surface (59-62) on which the wheels are disposed. Video cameras are used to obtain images of the various optical targets and a computer (125) is responsive to the images of the targets to determine values of wheel alignment parameters of the vehicle relative to said surface on which the vehicle wheels roll. The surface on which the wheels are disposed may be an automotive lift (121), and apparatus is disclosed for keeping the optical targets in the same position in the field of view of the camera(s) whether the lift is in its rest or in an elevated or reclined position.
Abstract:
A wheel balancer for mounting a wheel/tire assembly has sensors (19, 21) for sensing imbalance forces, a spindle encoder (15) and a graphic signal processing chip (23). The signal processing chip also controls a CRT display (25) and controls a D.C. motor through motor control circuitry (27) and tracks spindle position from encoder (15). The balancer also includes manual inputs (29). The balancer is programmed to determine wheel imbalance from the sensors and the motor speed can be controlled to take imbalance measurements at different speeds, depending upon the conditions or desires of the operator. The use of a dc motor also facilitates dynamic braking.
Abstract:
Apparatus and method for determining the alignment positions and orientations of vehicle wheels (30, 31, 32, 33) includes a pair of measurement transducers (10, 11), each of which is mounted on separate vehicle wheels and each of which is capable of measuring the range and relative bearing to the other. Three such pairs (42, 46) (43, 45) (44, 47) of measurement transducers are mounted on the vehicle wheels (30, 31, 32, 33) in conventional locations. A computer (1) is connected to the transducers (10, 11) and programmed to compute the toe alignment measurements in a conventional manner. The computer is further programmed to compute the coordinates of the wheels (30, 31, 32, 33), in an arbitrary coordinate system, from the relative range and bearing measurements. The coordinate system may be transformed relative to the sensor center line (CL), the vehicle thrust line (Y-axis), the vehicle frame or body center line (FCL), or any desirable reference frame, thereby providing measurements of the actual wheel positions and alignment angles in the transformed coordinate system.
Abstract:
An improved vehicle alignment system (1) includes automatic angle and distance range calibration whereby various vehicle distances such as track width and wheelbase may be measured electro-optically during the alignment process. The system also includes an improved process which results in shorter measurement cycles for the sensors by utilizing an electronic shutter control. The sensors (19, 21 and 23) work in pairs, and a novel synchronization scheme is used to ensure that the emitters (25) of one sensor (19) are not radiating at the same time the emitters (25) of the other sensor (21) of that pair are radiating and to determine which emitter (25) of the pair corresponding to a sensor (19) is radiating. Reflections of the emitters (25) from nearby surfaces are discriminated from direct transmissions so that the angle of incidence is accurately determined. Moreover, determination of the angle of incidence is simplified by use of a lens (95) whose image position varies in a specific manner as the imaged object moves radially away from the axis of the lens (95). The present system is particularly suited for measuring difficult alignment measurements such as toe-out on turns electro-optically with a minimal number of sensors (19, 21, 23).